This time not quite agree with Michele Santoro, after the episode of yesterday, because although it is true that freedom of speech must be guaranteed for all, he must be ensured, because everyone can do the same. Especially during its transmission "Annozero. What happened with the announcement shows that sometimes Santoro poorly digest the opinions of others.

The subject is too important to be trivialized by a skirmish between Santoro and Annunziata, but that's the argument, namely generatasi extremely serious situation in Gaza following the Israeli bombing, which triggered a reaction from the journalist who among other things in turn is famous for the same reason. Even the journalist, former president of RAI , is often criticized for its positions. But what happened during the episode of Annozero I think is serious. It is not the first time that Santoro is acting this way in telling his point of view, in some cases failing to tell other parts of reality that would give a broader view of the fact that ch is going to narrate. Not enough to invite into the studio this or that character is believed to be the opposite, I mean in terms of thought, then do not talk or even forcing him to abandon the study. Why unfortunately is exactly what happened. When the Annunciation took the floor to express "his" vision of how he was going transmission, which is skewed to one side, here Santoro bursts rudely into disarray even the little good that was said during the broadcast .

The speech is very simple. If you first cries censorship of your ideas and complaints right space to express your thoughts, then the same thing you have to rely on it for others. Even for those who think quite differently from yours. Otherwise everything is distorted, is trivialized. And that is why I disagree with Santoro.